Bad
news: I’ve hit a roadblock tracing the Smith male line in Wales.
As
outlined in a recent post, I have a fair amount of information about Thomas, our
great great grandfather, including his date and place of birth (1798, Abergwili,
Wales), occupation (inland revenue agent) and father’s and mother’s names (John
and Bridget). But that’s as far as I can go with assurance.
I do
have a baptismal record for a John Smith also born in Abergwili, in 1761. He’s
in the right place to be Thomas’s father. People didn’t often move far from
where they were settled in those days. It would not be surprising if John the
father of Thomas had stayed most of his life and sired a family in the place he
was born.
Detail of page in Abergwili, Wales parish register |
This
John Smith is also the right age, or at least a plausible age, to be Thomas’s
Dad – 37 in 1798. And Abergwili is a tiny place. The population today is under
600. It may once have been somewhat bigger since it was a bishopric. (The
palace, dating from 1542, survives.) Still, is it likely in a place so small that
there would be two John Smiths in the same generation?
Not
likely, perhaps, but unfortunately possible. John Smith is a very common name – although this being
Wales, perhaps less common than Richard Evans, say.
The fact
that John was an “excise officer,” an employee of the central government in
London – he’s listed as such in Thomas’s baptismal record – also means he may
have been posted to Abergwili, rather than having been born there. (It’s the
fact that John is listed as an excise officer that makes me certain I have the
right baptismal record for Thomas. We know for sure Tom was a revenuer, and sons
were very likely in those days to follow the same profession as their fathers.)
The Exciseman and the Countryman, Woodward & Cruikshank (Lewis Walpole Library) |
The
excellent National Archives (of Britain) website has a surprising amount of
historical information about the collecting of taxes, excises and duties and
the people, like our ancestors, who did it. The first instruction on how to use
the site’s resources to search for ancestors is, “Try to find out…in which
county the person was posted.”
I think
there’s still a pretty good chance the John Smith born in Abergwili in 1761 is our
great great great grandfather. After all, Inland Revenue must have sometimes hired
locally. If this is our guy, then we also now know the name of our 4X great
grandpa: John Edward Smith (see page from parish registry above).
I can’t
find any other very likely hits for a John Edward Smith in the available online
resources, though, so I’m still at a stand still. I may have to go over there
one of these years and root around in undigitized records.
Bostonians Pay The Exciseman, 1774, attributed to Philip Dawe |
Footnote 1 Excisemen, like our ancestor John
Smith in Abergwili, were apparently not held in high regard in the 18th
century. They were considered avaricious, dishonest and unfeeling – especially, of course, in America. The two
cartoons illustrating this post give you the idea. On the other hand, the Scots poet
Robbie Burns earned his living as an exciseman, at about the same time as John
Smith was working in Wales.
Footnote 2 Searching in the National Archives database of historical records related to Inland Revenue, I found one for a Thomas Smith working as an “Excise man” in Scotland in 1826. The chronology works. Our Thomas would have been 27 or 28 that year. Was he posted to Scotland for a period before making his way to Gloucestershire in time to retire in the 1840s or 1850s? Possibly. Maybe I’ll send away for scanned copies of the handwritten documents to see what other details they provide.
But no, he wouldn't have been a colleague of Burns, who died two years before Thomas was born.
Tangent/shameless bragging: The second satirical engraving you've illustrated here refers to an infamously hated excise officer named John Malcolm, who was one of the most prominent loyalists to get tarred and feathered in pre-Revolutionary Boston - a similar print is referenced in my newly published article! :)
ReplyDeleteYou should link the article (or at least send us the link!)
Deletehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1754-0208.2012.00550.x/abstract
DeleteUnfortunately only accessible to those with a subscription or willing to buy the journal :( Notice that the very small thumbnail of the journal uses an image from my article as the cover illustration, making mine the de facto cover story! Woop!